|
NCTC's official statement of mission, purpose and goals specifies
that the College will maintain "a qualified, competent faculty,
staff and administration who are dedicated to carrying out the
role, scope and mission of the institution as adopted by the Board."
In order to meet these goals effectively, the President, as authorized
by Board Policy BFA (Local) ensures that each employee must be
qualified for his or her position in the organization. The evaluation
process exists to help ensure quality employees and provide a process
for identifying:
- Exceptional qualities
- Suggested & required improvements
- Methods by which suggested and required improvements can be
achieved
Following are specific criteria used in evaluating the different
employee categories. Note that evaluation of Faculty
is coordinated and compiled by the office of the Vice President
of
Instruction
with assistance from the Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness,
which also coordinates and compiles evaluations of Administration.
(For a copy of the Administrative evaluation instrument, click
here.)
Professional Staff || Support
Staff || Maintenance Staff
Annual Evaluation Calendar
Professional Staff will be evaluated using the following
criteria (each item being rated by the evaluator on a scale of 1
to 5, with 5 being the highest and 0 indicating "Not Applicable"
or "No Opportunity to Observe." The evaulation
instrument also
provides
space for written comments (strengths, weaknesses, suggested and/or
required improvements, etc.):
- Personal characteristics
- Possesses general knowledge of the
institution
- Possesses specific knowledge necessary for the position
- Welcomes
differences of opinion
- Inspires enthusiasm
- Administrative Leadership & Planning
- Uses democratic procedures
and promotes teamwork whenever possible
- Inspires personnel to
independent, creative work
- Is alert to recognize or devise useful
innovations
- Selects equipment wisely within budget constraints
- Effectively
establishes priorities
- Makes effective effort for growth of personnel
- Employs as capable
of personnel as possible
- Delegates responsibility effectively
- Work Efficiency
- Works hard
- Welcomes additional responsibility
- Meets emergencies competently
- Conducts work as expeditiously
as possible
- The essential work of the position is completed on
time
- Personnel Relations
- Compliments and thanks personnel appropriately
and sincerely
- Actively seeks to counsel and assist personnel
- Possesses insight
into the professional problems and workload details of his/her
personnel
- Avoids display of unwarranted favoritism to some personnel
- Contributes
positively to the general morale of the staff
- General
- Works to enhance the image of the college in general
- Initiative
and resourcefulness
- Keeps abreast of major issues and innovations
related to the position
- Communicates effectively
- Listens effectively
- Ability to acknowledge and learn from mistakes
- My overall rating
of this administrator is:

Support Staff employees will be evaluated using the
following criteria (each item being rated by the evaluator on
a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest and 0 indicating "Not
Applicable" or "No Opportunity to Observe." The
evaulation
instrument also provides space for written comments
(strengths, weaknesses, suggested and/or required improvements,
etc.):
- Job knowledge
- Quantitative productivity
- Qualitative production
- Organization
- Dependability
- Adaptability
- Judgement
- Cooperation
- Initiative
- Resourcefulness
- Communication
- Meeting and handling staff/public
- Attitude toward
constructive criticism
- Attendance
- Punctuality
- Personal behavior and attire
- Safety/security
If the employee has supervisory responsibility, the
following criteria are also evaluated:
- Planning and assigning
- Training and instructing
- Providing feedback
- Communication
- Fairness and impartiality
- Approachability

Maintenance employees will be evaluated using the
following criteria, each item being rated by the evaluator on
a scale of 1 ("unsatisfactory") to 4 ("commendable"), with 4 being
the highest. The evaulation
instrument also provides space for
written
comments
(strengths, weaknesses, suggested and/or required improvements,
etc.)::
- Knowledge of job being performed
- Progress toward learning
total job
- Personal contribution to total team objective
- Plans
ahead to minimize problems
- Maintains high quality/minimum re-work
- Cooperation
- Ability to communicates effectively
- Willingness to
express ideas
- Makes work related decisions with a minimum amount
of supervision
- Participation in housekeeping activities
- Observes
safety rules
- Uses corrective action when unsafe practices and/or
conditions exist
- Attendance in last 12 months

The practice of the
College is for each full or part-time employee to receive
a formal, written evaluation of performance once each fiscal
year. This process
should document discussions with the employee about performance.
The evaluation
will also be used to plan
professional development.
Formal evaluations of Professional and
Professional/Technical
Support (contracted) employees should be
conducted by February
28th of each year prior to contract
renewal decisions
approved by the Board of Trustees each April. Formal evaluations
of
non-contract
personnel (Maintenance
and
Staff Support)
should also be
completed by February
28th of each year. In any event, a formal evaluation will
be completed
in each fiscal year
covering performance for the prior year period and identifying
performance
and
professional
development
goals
for the coming
year.
Refer to Board
Policy BFA (Local).
Click links to download sample performance evaluation
forms for
non-faculty personnel.
Evaluation instructions
are distributed
as required.

|